Die Schönheitskönigin (The Beauty Queen), 1930
Oil on Canvas
Anton Räderscheidt (Whereabouts unknown)
[…] The aspect of voyeurism is brought up prematurely in the research literature due to the combination of naked women and dressed men.904 First of all, with Räderscheidt you should distinguish between visual and external visual relationships, between men and the nude figure as well as the viewer and the nude figure. The man with the stiff hat would have to peer over to see the woman, the posture of his head suggests a gaze fixed on the horizon. The faceless men in the background also only have a limited opportunity to look voyeuristically, especially since they stand behind the woman. In a nutshell this means, that in Räderscheidt’s interpretation the alienation of the sexes has already progressed so far that not even the passive sexuality of voyeurism is possible. Walter views the faceless men in the background as support for the woman, “they are ready to attack the man in the foreground under her leadership”: “These anonymous figures represent a multiplication of physical strength on the female side; they function as a visualization of male aspects of the beauty queen.906 However, Räderscheidt does not unilaterally assign blame to the detriment of the “masculinized” woman who is responsible for the alienation. By following the tradition of nude painting, he assigns the sportswoman to the old role of the model and at the same time breaks up its sexual availability through the design of the naked body. In contrast to the men in the picture, the viewer of the picture has an unlimited view of the woman, but he cannot let his gaze wander undisturbed and unobserved – an important characteristic of voyeurism,906 because like the tennis player, the beauty queen also returns the gaze. But is she even capable of acting in her stiff puppet-like form?
Die Tennisspielerin (The Tennis Player), 1926
Oil on Canvas
Anton Räderscheidt, Pinakothek der Modernen
895 Horst Richter (1972, p. 20) probably considers the picture, like the other sports acts, to be “free […] of erotic allusions or even lascivious secondary tones because of these qualities.
896 Gerster takes this erroneous view in 1992. p. 45.
897 Macs 1993. p. 15.
898 Rase distinguishes between two types of representation, the boxer portrait and the fight scene. The former was a popular motif in painting in the 1920s (cf. Rase 2003. pp. 161-171). Räderscheidt is not taken into account in Rase’s investigation. probably. \ Because his Beauty Queen does not fit into the typology postulated by her and her thesis of the boxer as a pagan of modern industrial society (cf. also note 815).
899 Cf. also Herzog 1991. p. 39: Seelen 1995. p. U8.
900 Maes (1993. p. 16/17), on the other hand, reads the picture as an affirmative allusion to the war between the sexes. In the background the voyeuristic jury stands at attention like a soldier ‘(ibid .. p. 17). Since the man holds his left arm in front of his body, Maes allows himself to be carried away to the association that he is ornate in front of the woman. This underlines his loneliness. especially since the female figure is more of a pubescent girl looking for identity. which is why the boxing ring that only reaches to the knee can also be interpreted as a playpen. This thoroughly imaginative interpretation turns out to be purely speculative when looking at the composition and the figures soberly.
901 Victor Weixler. The winner. Caricature from the “Faun”. Fig. In the “Bilder-Lexikon der Erotik 1928. Vol. I. S. 257. 218
902 Gerster 1992. p. 52. See also Maes 1993. p. 16.
903 In the “Bild-Lexikon der Erotik” (1928. vol. I. P. 798) it says on the subject of sport and erotic […], that an erotic connection mostly occurs among the spectators at sporting events . Blood frenzy is particularly prevalent among the female audience at boxing events. sadistic and masochistic feelings are the main motives for sympathy, but also in other sports disciplines. , like in football (whose sense chasing the ball into the goal. Psychoanalysis chief interprets it as an idea of coitus), in wrestling and Swimming. Voyeur instincts also never play with exhibitionism and normal sexual sensation for which the struggle between the stronger and the weaker is a understandable incentive in sex-psychologically. This sexual background also explains the exaggerated veneration of modern sports heroes.
904 This erroneous view, among others, in Gerster 1992. S. 51/52; Maes 1993.S. l6 / 17. 905 Walter 1991. p. 285. 906 Cf. Zimbardo 1988. p. 515.